Experts confident of Congressional funding for US Cures Act.
نویسنده
چکیده
Just 5 weeks before his presidency ended, Barack Obama signed the 21st Century Cures Act, a law that will sustain several of his signature biomedical research initiatives, streamline the US drug and medical device approval process, improve the nation’s mental health-care system, and combat the country’s opioid misuse epidemic. The legislation won nearly unanimous approval in both houses of Congress, a bipartisan consensus that might be suffi cient to protect it from the looming political storms as Washington lawmakers begin to upend Obama’s Affordable Care Act (ACA). Opponents of that eff ort, which fulfi ls a long-standing Republican campaign pledge, fear it could push new medical discoveries beyond the reach of patients who desperately need them. The 21st Century Cures Act will provide US$6·3 billion over the next 10 years, including $4·8 billion for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to support Obama’s Cancer Moonshot project exploring new cancer treatments, the Precision Medicine Initiative investigating how drugs can be genetically tailored to patients, the BRAIN Initiative developing new tools to understand the human brain, and a regenerative medicine programme using adult stem cells. Another $500 million is earmarked for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to hire more staff scientists at competitive salaries, and help get pharmaceutical products to market sooner. The Cures Act also provides $1 billion for Americans seeking drug addiction treatment. About half of the funding for the law comes from the ACA’s Prevention and Public Health Fund, with most of the remaining support coming from the sale of oil from the nation’s strategic petroleum reserve. Obama praised the law at a White House signing ceremony in December, and then paused to remember his mother, who died of cancer. “She was two and a half years younger than I am today when she passed away”, said Obama, who is 55 years old. “And so it’s not always easy to remember, but being able to honour those we’ve lost in this way and to know that we may be able to prevent other families from feeling that same loss, that makes it a good day”, he said.
منابع مشابه
Congressional Foreign Policy Actors on the Two Iran Banking Sanction Laws during the Obama Administration
The United States and Iran as former allies turned into adversaries after the Islamic Revolution of 1979. Since then the United States has tried to contain Iran as a state considered to be a threat to the U.S. national security. The U.S. Congress has also acted in line with the administrations’ policies and in some cases directed the administration to take a tougher stance toward Iran. A review...
متن کاملScientific publications on firearms in youth before and after Congressional action prohibiting federal research funding.
Scientific Publications on Firearms in Youth Before andAfter Congressional Action Prohibiting Federal Research Funding In January1996,Congresspassedanappropriationsbill amendment prohibiting the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) fromusing“fundsmadeavailable for injuryprevention . . . toadvocateorpromoteguncontrol.”1Thisprovision was triggered by evidence linking gun ownership ...
متن کاملBiodefense funding: changes from president's budget to congressional appropriations.
S ince 2004, the Center for Biosecurity has tracked and published a series of articles detailing funding for civilian biodefense programs throughout the federal government. Each year, when the President publishes a budget for the federal agencies, the biodefense funding analysis is updated with new appropriations amounts and new programs. Estimated funding for the previous fiscal year is replac...
متن کاملCan Private Interests Buy Public Science ? *
Can private interest groups influence the decisions of independent experts to achieve their desired outcomes? This study analyzes a common non-market strategy — lobbying powerful politicians — through which interest groups seek to influence the allocation of public funds in the context of peerreviewed funding for research on rare diseases by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). We find evid...
متن کاملMorality and Values in Support of Universal Healthcare Must be Enshrined in Law; Comment on “Morality and Markets in the NHS”
This is a commentary on Gilbert and colleagues’ (1) paper on morality and markets in the National Health Service (NHS). Morality and values are not ephemeral qualities and universal healthcare is not simply an aspiration; it has to be enshrined in law. The creation of the UK NHS in 1948 was underpinned by core legal duties which required a system of public funding and delivery to follow. The mo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Lancet
دوره 389 10065 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017